SAIL (Steel Authority of India) Financial Model — 3-Statement, FCFF/WACC DCF Valuation & Dashboard
Originally published: 07/08/2026 13:00
Publication number: ELQ-58173-1
View all versions & Certificate
certified

SAIL (Steel Authority of India) Financial Model — 3-Statement, FCFF/WACC DCF Valuation & Dashboard

3-statement steel-sector model with FCFF/WACC DCF valuation, working capital schedules, and interactive dashboard.

Description
This is a fully integrated financial model for SAIL (Steel Authority of India), built on a 3-statement framework tailored to the capital-intensive, cyclical nature of steel manufacturing. Unlike banking models, this one is structured around a volume × realisation revenue driver, a COGS-heavy cost structure, and a capex-funded fixed-asset base — with dedicated schedules for Working Capital (inventory, receivable, and payable days), Depreciation & Amortization, Debt & Interest, and Equity, each rolling forward from FY2020-21 actuals through FY2029-30E projections.


Valuation is anchored in a Free Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF) DCF, discounted at a CAPM-derived WACC (Beta, risk-free rate, and equity risk premium explicitly modeled), with Enterprise Value bridged to Equity Value per Share via a net-debt adjustment — a step often missed in simpler DCF templates. A PE-relative cross-check sits alongside the DCF as a secondary valuation lens, since P/B and DDM methods (standard for financials) don't apply to a manufacturer. Terminal growth is deliberately anchored to long-run structural inflation rather than current-cycle GDP growth, avoiding the instability that comes from a thin WACC-growth spread.


Key output ratios include EBITDA margin, ROE, ROCE, Net Debt/EBITDA, and Interest Coverage, all tracked across the full forecast horizon. A dedicated Dashboard sheet consolidates the valuation snapshot, WACC assumptions, financial trends, and leverage position into a single, chart-driven view — making the model equally useful for quick screening or deep-dive equity research on India's metals and mining sector.

This Best Practice includes
1 Power point and 1 excel file

Kislay Singh offers you this Best Practice for free!

download for free

Add to bookmarks

Discuss

Further information

Provide a ready-to-use, fully-linked 3-statement financial model for SAIL (Steel Authority of India) as a template for steel/metals-sector equity research

Demonstrate correct FCFF-based DCF valuation mechanics — including the Enterprise Value → Net Debt → Equity Value bridge that is frequently missed in simpler DCF templates

Illustrate CAPM-based WACC derivation (Beta, risk-free rate, equity risk premium) built up transparently from first principles rather than as a black-box input

Model the full working-capital cycle (inventory, receivable, and payable days) and D&A/Debt/Equity schedules as linked, rolling schedules rather than static assumptions

Showcase a defensible approach to terminal value assumptions, anchoring long-run growth to structural inflation rather than short-term GDP cycles, to avoid unstable Gordon Growth outputs

Package model outputs into a single-page, chart-driven Dashboard for quick screening alongside the detailed schedules for deep-dive analysis

Valuing capital-intensive, asset-heavy manufacturers (steel, cement, metals & mining) where FCFF/WACC is the appropriate DCF framework, not P/E, P/B, or DDM

Companies with a clear volume × price revenue driver and a COGS-dominated cost structure

Businesses carrying meaningful leverage, where the Enterprise Value-to-Equity Value bridge (net debt adjustment) materially changes the per-share output

Analysts who want a transparent, auditable WACC build-up (rather than a single hardcoded discount rate) to defend or stress-test assumptions

Use cases where a 4-year explicit forecast plus a single terminal value is an acceptable level of granularity (e.g., screening, coursework, or initiating coverage) rather than institutional-grade multi-stage modeling

Banks, NBFCs, or insurance companies — these require P/E, P/B, or DDM-based valuation and RBI-compliant statement formats (NII/NIM, CASA, asset quality schedules), not FCFF/WACC

Businesses with highly volatile, cycle-driven cash flows where a single terminal growth rate cannot adequately capture multi-year peak-to-trough swings — a longer explicit forecast or multi-stage DCF would be more appropriate

Situations requiring a fully projected (not just historical) balance sheet — this model forecasts capital structure through dedicated Debt & Equity schedules rather than a line-by-line projected balance sheet

Cross-border or multi-currency companies, since the model is built entirely in ₹ Crore with India-specific tax and regulatory assumptions

High-frequency trading or short-term price-target use cases — this is a fundamentals-driven, long-horizon valuation tool, not a technical or momentum-based model


0.0 / 5 (0 votes)

please wait...