Offshore Wind Ultimate Model — Fixed-Bottom · 8 Markets · CFD Mechanics · 25-Year DCF
Originally published: 16/05/2026 18:14
Publication number: ELQ-32392-1
View all versions & Certificate
certified

Offshore Wind Ultimate Model — Fixed-Bottom · 8 Markets · CFD Mechanics · 25-Year DCF

You have an offshore wind project to evaluate. This production-ready Excel model gives you a fully calibrated 25-year DCF across 8 markets with correct CFD

Description
Offshore wind is not onshore wind with bigger turbines. The economics are fundamentally different — CAPEX 2.5 times higher, vessel-based O&M, 25-year asset life, two-sided CfD contracts that work nothing like a standard FiT, and project finance structures that routinely involve mini-perm arrangements or concessional tranches from institutions like the EIB or DoE. If you evaluate offshore wind with a generic DCF template, you are not building a bankable case — you are building a number that will not survive lender scrutiny.
This model is built specifically for offshore wind, with every mechanism modelled correctly.

Select your market and scenario, enter your installed capacity and revenue allocation — and every output updates automatically. Project IRR, Equity IRR, NPV, payback, minimum DSCR and average DSCR over the loan life. A full 25-year cash flow with turbine degradation, OPEX escalation and a complete debt schedule. Ready to present, ready to share, ready to defend.


What makes it different from a generic DCF template
The CfD is modelled as a two-sided contract — not as a simple FiT. The project receives the guaranteed strike price regardless of market price movement in either direction. Net revenue to the project equals strike price multiplied by CfD volume plus merchant price multiplied by merchant volume. This is how offshore CfDs actually work in the UK, Germany, France, Italy and Nordic markets, and it is what lenders and advisors expect to see in a financial model.
Country configurations reflect market reality, not a uniform assumption set. The Netherlands operates as a pure PPA/Merchant market under SDE++ negative bidding — no CfD premium, high capacity factors compensating. Taiwan has the highest capacity factors in the dataset, 4,200–5,000 MWh/MW, with a dominant FiT share. The UK is calibrated to CfD AR7 at £90.91/MWh. Germany uses EEG Marktprämie sliding premium mechanics. Each country activates only the revenue streams that actually exist in that market.
Three debt structure options are available from the CONTROL_PANEL. Standard is linear amortisation with a 2-year grace period — the base case. Mini-perm models a 3-year grace period, 4-year accelerated amortisation and then refinancing at a lower rate, reflecting how many offshore projects are actually structured at financial close. Blended Finance applies a concessional tranche from EIB, AIIB or DoE LPO, reducing the blended cost of debt by a configurable number of basis points — relevant for emerging offshore markets and projects with a development finance dimension.
The assumption sets are sourced from the most current available data. BNEF H2 2025 Offshore Wind Market Outlook, WindEurope 2025, UK CfD AR7 January 2026, Westwood Energy February 2026, NREL ATB 2024, IRENA 2024, and national regulatory sources including Ofgem, Bundesnetzagentur, CRE/RTE, GSE FER E, RVO/TenneT, NVE Norway and MOEA Taiwan. Typical P50 offshore yield ranges by market are provided in the model.
USA ITC Section 48E at 30% is modelled as a net CAPEX reduction — the correct treatment for a tax equity structure.


Who this is for

Developers and IPPs running feasibility or commercial evaluation on offshore wind projects. Financial advisors and investment banks structuring offshore project finance or preparing lender presentations. Infrastructure funds and institutional investors screening offshore wind opportunities across multiple markets. Anyone who needs a specialist offshore wind model that handles CfD mechanics, debt structure complexity and 25-year asset life correctly.


Workbook: CONTROL_PANEL · OFFSHORE_INPUTS · OFFSHORE_CONFIGURATION · REVENUE_ENGINE · FINANCIAL_MODEL · DASHBOARD.


For custom versions, country extensions or specific requests, contact us at [email protected]

This Best Practice includes
1 Excel Model, 1 PDF Guide

Acquire business license for $161.00

Add to cart

Add to bookmarks

Discuss

Further information

This model enables developers, advisors and investors to evaluate the financial viability of a fixed-bottom offshore wind project across 8 international markets with correctly modelled two-sided CfD mechanics, without building a specialist model from scratch. It supports comparison across Conservative, Base and Aggressive scenarios, handles the market-specific revenue configurations that differ significantly across countries, and produces a full set of project finance returns — Project IRR, Equity IRR, NPV, minimum DSCR and average DSCR — from a 25-year cash flow that reflects the actual design life of offshore foundations. It also enables evaluation of three distinct debt structures — Standard, Mini-perm and Blended Finance — from a single CONTROL_PANEL selector.

This model is best suited to fixed-bottom offshore wind greenfield projects in the 200–1,000 MW range at early-stage feasibility, strategic screening or commercial evaluation, prior to full technical due diligence. It is calibrated for UK, Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands, Nordic, USA and Taiwan, and works particularly well when a P50 offshore wind resource assessment is available — typical P50 ranges by market are provided in the model. It is also well suited to structured finance contexts where mini-perm or blended finance structures need to be evaluated alongside standard project finance, and to M&A and advisory contexts requiring a rigorous, auditable Excel model.

This model covers fixed-bottom offshore wind only and is not designed for floating offshore wind, which has materially different CAPEX structures, mooring and dynamic cable costs, and financing terms that are not yet standardised at utility scale. It does not include a co-located BESS module, as offshore battery storage at utility scale remains pre-commercial. It is not suited to markets outside the 8 pre-loaded countries without manual customisation of the assumption sets. It should not be used as the sole basis for a final investment decision — offshore CAPEX is highly site-specific, driven by water depth, distance from shore, soil conditions and port access, and must be validated with a site-specific offshore wind resource assessment, grid connection study, environmental impact assessment and professional legal and financial advice. Projects below 100 MW will likely see different cost structures than the benchmark assumptions in the model.


0.0 / 5 (0 votes)

please wait...